- In The Money: eCommerce, DTC and CPG
- Posts
- Pets, Fashion AI, and Activist Pressure
Pets, Fashion AI, and Activist Pressure
The vet sector heats up, Phoebe Gates launches Phia, Carter’s fends off an activist hedge fund, and Jay Wright shares hard truths on growth plateaus.
🐾 The Pet Care Arms Race
Modern Animal just raised $46M (led by Addition, True Ventures, and Upfront Ventures), scaling to 27 clinics and a revenue run rate north of $100M. The thesis? That tech-enabled, membership-based vet care can transform a $30B+ market.
But Modern Animal isn’t alone:
Southern Veterinary Partners + Mission Veterinary Partners merged into a 750+ clinic platform valued at $8.6B (Silver Lake + Shore Capital backed).
Small Door Veterinary raised $55M to expand beyond the East Coast.
Sploot raised $40M from L Catterton for design-forward vet clinics.
UK’s Creature Comforts raised £7M for its hybrid tech + clinic model.
Capital markets takeaway:
Scale players (SVP + MVP) are consolidating into billion-dollar networks.
Challenger startups are building consumer-first experiences with membership and tech.
Even early-stage is funded, whitespace is global.
The race is on: will the winners be mega-platforms, or membership-first challengers that own the consumer relationship?
👖 Fashion AI with Famous Backers
Phoebe Gates (yes, Bill Gates’ daughter) just raised $8M for her shopping AI app, Phia, alongside co-founder Sophia Kianni. Backers include Kleiner Perkins, Kris Jenner, Sara Blakely, and Sheryl Sandberg.
Key stats:
500k+ users within months of launch
300M+ indexed fashion & resale items
Competitive context:
Honey (PayPal) owns coupon automation.
Ibotta & Fetch dominate cashback.
Rakuten and RetailMeNot have affiliate-driven shopping locked.
Phia’s wedge? Fashion + resale, positioned less as a coupon scraper and more as a “should I buy this?” advisor; factoring in resale values, price comparisons, and deal discovery.
The question: is there room for another shopping assistant, or is Phia’s differentiation enough to carve out a category of its own?
🍼 Carter’s Becomes an Activist Target
Children’s apparel giant Carter’s woke up to an activist hedge fund, Roseman Wagner Wealth Management (RWWM), quietly amassing a 17% stake (~$180M invested). Carter’s responded with a poison pill.
Why? Carter’s trades at 0.6× revenue and 7× EBITDA, a discount to recent brand/IP comps:
Champion → ABG at 0.7× revenue
Reebok → ABG at ~1× revenue
Dickies → Bluestar at 0.9× revenue
Brand platforms like ABG, WHP, and Bluestar don’t care about mall traffic, they buy consumer mindshare, strip cost structures, and monetize through licensing.
Takeaway: If Carter’s brand/IP is under-monetized, its equity story looks very different under a licensing lens than in public markets. Proxy fight, sale, or licensing pivot — Carter’s is now in play.🎙️ Podcast: Caroline Weintraub on The 5 P’s of Beauty Investing
🎙️ Podcast Highlight: Breaking Through Growth Plateaus
This week, I sat down with Jay Wright (Founder of Ecommerce Equation), who has worked with thousands of brands and overseen $500M+ in annual ad spend. His frameworks for mid-7-figure brands stuck on growth are brutally pragmatic:
Instrument first: Split new vs. repeat revenue, MER vs. CAC, and cohort payback windows.
Creative with intent: Tag by pillars, personas, and angles; build congruent landers like “5 reasons why [persona] is switching to [product].”
Retention that scales: Meta ads to lapsed customers can double repeat revenue.
AI as a floor-raiser: Use it for variants and congruency scoring; focus your human time on big creative bets.
Play the long game: The leap from $150K → $700K/month or $1M → $15M never came from one magic ad, but from disciplined systems.
If you’re stuck on growth, this episode is a blueprint for getting unstuck the right way.
🎧 Watch on YouTube, listen on Spotify.
That’s it for this week.
If you liked this issue, forward to a friend who obsesses over brand strategy, capital flows, or exit timing.
In the Money – following the flow of capital in consumer
P.S. We love talking to brands interested in exiting in the next 3-18 months. If you know of any brands interested in exiting, or any firms trying to help port cos manage turnarounds, we'd love to share a POV.
fan [at] thehedgehogcompany.com
